After featuring both the Guerlain Autumn and Winter collections recently, I got a few emails regarding the pink Rouge Gs from each, Madam Batifole and Provocative, so I thought comparing the two was a good idea:
Madame Batifole (left) is from the limited edition Madame Violette autumn collection currently on counters, and has a fishnet effect etched onto the casing. Provocative is from the Crazy Paris Christmas collection which will be on counter from November. Both are rather cool bright pinks, but there are differences:
Madame Batifole is the darker of the two, and Provocative is lighter. Contextually, Provocative appears the "warmer" shade, but is still quite a cool shade of pink.
Here are some more comparison shots:
 |
| Natural daylight |
 |
| With Flash |
Both are creamy shades, but as you can just make out in the flash picture above, Madame Batifole has a slightly more visible blue micro-shimmer in the formula. Provocative contains it too, but it's less visible in the bullet. On the skin, however, the shimmer is barely visible, it basically just adds a little depth to the shades and stops them appearing "flat".
 |
| Natural Daylight |
 |
| With Flash |
They're both highly pigmented, and creamy. Here you can see how Madame Batifole on the left is definitely a deeper shade, and Provocative is a little warmer in comparison, almost a bubblegum pink, whereas Batifole appears more magenta in comparison.
Here they are on my (quite strongly pigmented) lips:
I'd say that Madame Batifole is definitely the more dramatic shade to wear, being a little darker and deeper, Provocative is a perfect everyday pink shade, one I'd consider a neutral, but my tolerance to bright shades is quite high, and your mileage might, as they say, vary.
I tried wearing one lip of each to show how the differences aren't, actually, that dramatic. This is provocative on the top, and Madam Batifole on the bottom. Equally bright, equally pigmented, just one is a little warmer, and one a little cooler in comparison.
Personally, if I could only have one, I'd have Madam Batifole, as I'm a lover of the dramatic lip colours, but Provocative is a great everyday pink too. They're both gorgeous, frankly.
The Fine Print: One's a PR sample, and one was a purchase. It genuinely doesn't matter which one is which.
Mental note: I shall never wear the foundation featured in this post ever again, it looks terrible. I know.
This post: Guerlain Rouge G Comparison: Madame Batifole vs Provovative originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Not much to say today, aside from the fact that I'm boggling a bit that I've been married for six months now ...
Mental.
This post: 6 Months ... originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
I have literally spent months trying to track this bloody thing down. Every SpaceNK I visit, I stare forlornly at the hole where Mood (and Diffused) are supposed to be, and then turn, dejected, back out to the street after yet another fruitless shopping trip. FINALLY I managed to track this one down on Liberty. I'm still on the lookout for Diffused, btw, so if you find anywhere that has it, please, please, please let me know!
This one, however, is Mood, a light lavender powder designed to brighten most skintones. I'm prone to (admittedly very pale) sallowness, particularly when extremely tired, and this helps perk me back up.
The Ambient Light powders are milled incredibly finely, and don't contain any opaque pigments so they're rather light and ethereal on the skin. I find they they do give a "polished" look to the skin, and they have a rather glowy finish, so you need to apply sparingly.
Here you can see it swatched heavily on the right, and blended out on the left of my hand, and you can see the sort of finish you will get. I use this most days, in particular over tinted moisturiser. I like the brush too (although you have to buy it separately and it's £30), and it's great for diffusing the powder across the skin.
I prefer this to more traditional powders, as it never looks cakey, and doesn't look like you're wearing any makeup at all, which is the greatest thing you can get from your makeup.
Now, if only I could find the yellow Diffused version ....
The Fine Print: Purchases.
This post: Hourglass Ambient Lighting Powder in Mood originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Well, I said I needed to try some cheaper makeup ... and here I am! Again, like Illamasqua, Sleek MakeUP isn't a brand I feature often, as a lot of the collections don't "speak" to me. This one, however, very much did. I don't get the packaging much, it says "Autumn" rather than "Romance" to me, but the contents are delightful:
The eyeshadow shades are named after honeymoon destinations, l-r on the top row we have
Pretty in Paris - silver (metallic)
Meet in Madrid - gold (metallic)
Court in Cannes - taupe (shimmer)
Lust in LA - olive (shimmer)
Romance in Rome - blackened navy (shimmer)
Propose in Prague - terracotta (matte)
And on the bottom row (l-r) we have
A Vow in Venice - maroon (shimmer)
Marry in Monte Carlo - fucshia (metallic)
Honeymoon in Hollywood - purple (shimmer)
Bliss in Barcelona - blackened purple (shimmer)
Forever in Florence - matte purple (glitter)
Love in London - matte black (glitter)
I found the shadows to be deeply pigmented, even without primer, but the pans are a little prone to kicking up dust, and they're slightly "glazed" after just a couple of uses, but for the price (£7.99) these are extremely minor quibbles.
I found the two darkest non-glitter shades were the hardest to swatch, both Romance in Rome (blackened navy, and Bliss in Barcelona (blackened purple) have a slight duochrome effect, but neither are as pigmented as any of the other shades, which is a shame, but this still leave ten really rich, pigmented and pretty colours to play with.
I created this look with the palette:
I used Court in Cannes all over the mobile lid up to the crease, and Lust in LA to line the lower rim. Then I defined the crease and outer corner with A Vow in Venice, and then patted a little Marry in Monte Carlo onto the lid to brighten. Then I liked the upper lid with Love in London. The look lasted all day over primer, and I was really pleased with it.
Antique is a bronzed-rose with a large amount of silvery-blue shimmer in the formula. It's pretty, but a little too glittery for me for everyday wear. Be a great shade for evening wear though. I'm an idiot and forgot to swatch this separately. For £4.99 though, this is a great bargain, it's very reminiscent of Sin by NARS. I'll try and swatch them side-by-side next week.
The Sleek MakeUP Vintage Romance palette and Antique blush will be available from September. You'll be able to find it at Superdrug.
The Fine Print: PR Samples.
This post: Sleek MakeUP Vintage Romance Palette & Antique Blush originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
The sharp-eyed amongst you will have noticed that I've featured two very similar lipstick shades this week, Illamasqua Shard and Lancome's Rose Sulfureuse, both shades of plum, they're both deep and pigmented and cool, I like them both very much. Typical though, you go and buy a lovely plum lipstick, then attend the launch of yet another beautiful plum lipstick literally minutes later - lipsticks are like buses, sometimes ...
Anyhoo, I thought it might be good to compare the two:
Illamasqua Shard is 4.2g for £16.50, and Lancome Rose Sulfureuse is 4.0g for £21.50.
In the bullet, Shard appears bluer, and deeper, whereas Rose Sulfureuse appears pinker, both look matte in the bullet, which is surprising.
On swatching, the differences are more pronounced. Shard is definitely far deeper and cooler, whilst Rose Sulfureuse is pinker, sheerer and far, far, far more glossy.
I applied a sheerer layer of Shard to my lips, than I did Rose, and the differences aren't quite as marked as a result, Shard is redder (but still cool) and rose is cooler, and still pinker. Shard will last a LOT longer than Rose, however, but Rose will be far kinder to your lips ...
Fancy one?
The Fine Print: Mixture of PR samples and purchases.
This post: Illamasqua Shard vs Lancome Rose Sulfureuse originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
I don't often post about Illamasqua, whilst I love them and a couple of their products are in my daily staples (liquid liner in Abyss, I'm talking about you), sometimes I find them just a little too edgy, not to mention precise for me. That said, I love the fact that they take risks, and that they feature shades difficult to find elsewhere. The Sacred Hour collection, however, is designed for the risk-averse, which is far more down my alley.
My picks from the collection (which also encompasses a set of eyelashes, two blushes, two nail polishes, and a new variant of the Skin Base foundation designed purely for the undereye, plus a set of gems) are the Reflection palette and the lipstick in Shard.
Reflection is a selection of almost neutral shades, and Shard is a beautiful plum matte lipstain. Let's take a closer look:
 |
| Natural Light |
|
|
 |
| With Flash |
|
The eyeshadows have an innovative powder to cream formulation, almost a gel, which makes them bouncy in the pan, and almost entirely gets rid of fallout, which, particularly with the darker shades is a blessing!
Clockwise from top left, the shades are: Precipice (icy pale yellow), Acute (silvered plum-mauve), Graphica (sparkling charcoal), and Dart (medium bronze). The shadows are perfect for being applied with your fingers - I found that applying them with a natural-hair brush washed the shades out a bit. Here they are, applied with a brush without primer:
The yellow doesn't show up so well on my skin as my skin is slightly yellow, but I love the mix of colours, and think it'd be easy to get a range of looks from this quad. My favourites in particular are Acute (surprise!) and Graphica. I find the shadows to be long-lasting even without a primer.
Here you can see them with the lipstick, which I adore. A long-lasting stain, this is a perfect cool purple (or, as illamasqua describe it, a red-violet). It can be applied fully as a completely opaque lipcolour, or sheered out as a stain, as below:
Applied fully, you can get a proper "goth" look going on, which I rather like, but your mileage may vary. I don't find it quite as drying as Illamasqua's other matte lipsticks (ironically), and the stain has excellent lasting properties.
What do you think of my picks of the Sacred Hour collection?
The Fine Print: PR Samples.
This post: Illamasqua Reflection Palette and Shard Lipstick originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
I've been sorting through my lipstick collection a bit recently, trying to find the best colours to "match" my new palette, and I realised that I didn't have any really deep but still cool purple shades. I have SO many burgundy and wine shades, in a variety of textures, but I wanted to explore some cooler shades. I'm short on plums for some reason, and, well, we are heading into autumn. Shush, autumn is by far my favourite time of year.
On my way through Debenhams, I did a quick smash and grab at the Lancome counter, and this colour caught my eye. I've only tried a lipgloss from the range previously, and, whilst I liked the packaging, I wasn't particularly wowed by the formula (or the colour), so haven't really written about the "Rouge in Love" range before.
The packaging is on the dinky side, being slightly smaller than the average lipstick casing, but there is still a full-size bullet in there which is nice (particularly as this has a £21 price tag). Billed as a hydrating formula with a six hour wear time, it's a very traditional kind of lipstick, completely in keeping with the slightly retro-feeling case.
It looks rather matte in the bullet, but this is misleading. It's actually a lovely, glossy shade of plum. not quite as dark as it appears here:
I don't think it does last quite as long as six hours on the lips because of the glossy formulation. Certainly, if you eat or drink something you'll have to top-up quicksmart, but it's an average-lasting shade, and it very definitely delivers on the hydration feeling both cushion-y and rather balm-y, and it has excellent pigmentation. It doesn't, however, stain the lips at all. Once the gloss is gone, the lipstick's gone completely, I found.
It's a glorious deep, cool raspberry shade on the lips. Not quite as "milky" as my camera is making it appear here (it's definitely closer to the hand swatch colour, for some reason), it's definitely a statement shade, without being too "vampy". The formulation is easy to wear - the press bumpf mentions "feather-lightness", and for once, I'm inclined to agree. It doesn't last quite as long as you'd expect from the box, and the advertising materials, but reapplying is a pleasure.
Overall, I definitely prefer the Rouge in Love over the Gloss in Love formula (though I adore the unusual "click it" opening for Gloss in Love), and I'm delighted with this shade. After a couple of weeks of £30+ lipsticks on the blog, £21 is beginning to seem positively mid-range ... I need to investigate some mega-cheap makeup soon, I think!
The Fine Print: Purchase.
This post: Lancome Rouge in Love - 379N Rose Sulfureuse originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
