Beauty Without Fuss
Popular Posts
Recent Posts
Saturday, 20 February 2010
Excited!
Today, I'm going to be tweeting live (backstage!) from The House of Blue Eyes event at London Fashion Week. Follow @Get_Lippie on Twitter, I'll be using the hashtags #LFW and #HOBE.
If you don't tweet, don't worry, there will be a full report here in the next day or so. I'm really very excited, Ilamasqua are doing the make up for the show and this is a unique opportunity for me to see what goes on in a professional setting!
Wish me luck, I'm going in…
Friday, 19 February 2010
Mission Statement?
I try not to make Get Lippie political - I've said before, it's all about the products and how they work as far as I'm concerned, but I thought I'd share this email exchange that took place today regarding a product that a PR firm wanted to see featured here my blog:
"Hi Louise,
NAME from PR FIRM here,
I'm writing today to see if you would be interested in posting a new piece of video content on http://www.getlippie.blogspot.com/
MADEUPNAME is a fun new campaign encouraging you to get creative, take a look at the video here: MADEUPNAME.com
...
We can pay you to post this video, to sign up as a publisher and for payment please visit MADEUPNAME.com
If you have any questions please get in touch."
(emphasis mine)
My response was as follows:
"Hi NAME
Thank you very much for getting in contact with Get Lippie.
Get Lippie does not feature sponsored posts, and nor do I accept payment for posts. Nor will I ever.
"Hi Louise,
NAME from PR FIRM here,
I'm writing today to see if you would be interested in posting a new piece of video content on http://www.getlippie.blogspot.com/
MADEUPNAME is a fun new campaign encouraging you to get creative, take a look at the video here: MADEUPNAME.com
...
We can pay you to post this video, to sign up as a publisher and for payment please visit MADEUPNAME.com
If you have any questions please get in touch."
(emphasis mine)
My response was as follows:
"Hi NAME
Thank you very much for getting in contact with Get Lippie.
Get Lippie does not feature sponsored posts, and nor do I accept payment for posts. Nor will I ever.
I write about products I've tried and tested - 90% of which I buy myself for the purposes of review. All products, regardless of their source, are tested thoroughly, and the reviews posted on my site - good and bad - are, above all, honest and true. I also do not feature video content, and have no plans to do so.
I believe that the concept of paying bloggers to feature products (not to mention your requirement that the posting be in a specific format) to be a pernicious one, and one I have no interest to be involved with. Your products may be wonderful, and in fact I have tried them already, but I will be unable to be involved in this particular project at this time.
Again, I thank you for your interest in Get Lippie. I assure you that if your product is mentioned on my blog in the future, my review will be honest, thorough, in the format of my choosing, and I will NOT have been paid to feature them."
I'm reprinting it here as I thought it was as good as a mission statement. What do you think about the concept of brands paying for posts?
EDIT:
It's been pointed out by another blogger (quite rightly) that my posting appears to misrepresenting what the email is actually asking people to do. I'm happy to make clear, and put right, that this email isn't asking for paid endorsement of a product, that it is in fact a request to rent "ad-space" on the blog. Whilst I'm more than happy to put that miscomprehension right - and I'm happy to have been corrected! - the above is still a genuine email conversation, and it was based on how *I* interpreted the request at the time it was put to me (actually I feel that the email from the company involved could have been much better-written to make their intent clear. But, then I would!), as such, I stand by my comments with regard to paid posts, and would like to make clear that my reply to the agency involved would still have been in the negative, for a variety of other reasons. Other people can, and will, feel differently. That's the beauty of blogging!
The foregoing post is merely a statement of *my* intent on *my* blog at this time.
I believe that the concept of paying bloggers to feature products (not to mention your requirement that the posting be in a specific format) to be a pernicious one, and one I have no interest to be involved with. Your products may be wonderful, and in fact I have tried them already, but I will be unable to be involved in this particular project at this time.
Again, I thank you for your interest in Get Lippie. I assure you that if your product is mentioned on my blog in the future, my review will be honest, thorough, in the format of my choosing, and I will NOT have been paid to feature them."
I'm reprinting it here as I thought it was as good as a mission statement. What do you think about the concept of brands paying for posts?
EDIT:
It's been pointed out by another blogger (quite rightly) that my posting appears to misrepresenting what the email is actually asking people to do. I'm happy to make clear, and put right, that this email isn't asking for paid endorsement of a product, that it is in fact a request to rent "ad-space" on the blog. Whilst I'm more than happy to put that miscomprehension right - and I'm happy to have been corrected! - the above is still a genuine email conversation, and it was based on how *I* interpreted the request at the time it was put to me (actually I feel that the email from the company involved could have been much better-written to make their intent clear. But, then I would!), as such, I stand by my comments with regard to paid posts, and would like to make clear that my reply to the agency involved would still have been in the negative, for a variety of other reasons. Other people can, and will, feel differently. That's the beauty of blogging!
The foregoing post is merely a statement of *my* intent on *my* blog at this time.
Christopher Drummond and Sue Devitt FotD
I've spoken of my love of "no-colour" makeup before. This morning I was going for a totally neutral but slightly sunkissed look (so tired of it being dull and grey outside, so brought some sunshine to my makeup!), and so I reached for:
Christopher Drummond Veludo foundation in Fair
Christopher Drummond Finishing powder in Branco
Christopher Drummond Radiance Booster in Saude Pele
Sue Devitt Eyeshadow in Lonely Splendor
Urban Decay liquid liner in Smog
Cover Girl Lash Blast mascara
Cargo Illuminator in Wind
Chanel Rouge Allure in Incognito
Taupe is my go-to colour at the moment, and the Sue Devitt shadow has been a lovely addition to my makeup bag, it's a very soft and subtle shade:
As you can see, I'm still using Endora as my style icon at the moment, I love me a bit of swoosh on my eyeliner! You won't be seeing any baby-blue shadow here though, I promise.
But what I really want to talk is the foundation, I've been having a lot of trouble with powder formulations lately, owing to having somewhat ... er ... mature skin, and it being a bit dry owing t the weather at the moment. I find a lot of powders - and even some pigment-heavier creams are just sinking into lines and crevices during the day which I swear simply did not exist in the morning!
So it was some trepidation that I approached the Christopher Drummond foundation, powder and highlight, I'll be honest. I was scared of looking cakey, dry and, well, old! I needn't have worried, these powders are silky smooth, and a delight to wear.
The Just Beauty Direct website (where my samples came from) says this about the Christopher Drummond range:
"100% natural, vegan, made with organic ingredients. These are products not only good for your skin, but good for the environment. Christopher Drummond believes that by having eco-friendly and animal-friendly cosmetics, we are contributing to the prosperity of our planet ...
... Christopher's skin-friendly all-natural, organic based formulations include such soothing ingredients, including açai, and green tea, which contain healing antioxidants.
These products which have a natural sunscreen and are non-comedogenic will leave your s kin feeling velvety soft and looking naturally radiant."
What I liked about these was that you don't have to "buff" them into your skin, you just brush them onto your face, as you would with a liquid foundation, sometimes I find that the "buffing" required with other mineral foundations can aggravate a sensitive skin. This foundation lasted really well, and didn't need a touch up until about three in the afternoon! The finishing powder is very, very silky indeed, and the Saude Pele added just a touch of champagne coloured highlight to my cheekbones. I was delighted that there was no settling, no cracking, no caking and ... no ageing!
All that said, I'll definitely consider buying the full size product, even though it's priced at a wallet-thumping £50 - but that contains a travel container, full size foundation, and flat-topped kabuki for application - but, I'd be interested to see if Just Beauty Direct have any plans just to stock the foundation refills at any point, as I hate being forced into buying a brush everytime I just need a powder. Maybe I'll just get one of his liquid lip pots in the meantime, I think the samples are going to last a while!
You can buy Christopher Drummond products here and Sue Devitt products are available from QVC or Harvey Nichols.
Thursday, 18 February 2010
Nail of the Day - OPI Crimsun
Yes, it's another Holographic polish, but this is one I'm a little disappointed in ...
Application was exceedingly sheer, meaning I still have visible nail lines, and ... it's pink. Not this orange shade you see here under my halogen lights, and not the crimson you assume from the name. It's pink. Fuschia-pink under most lights. Not a bad colour, as it happens, but not what I wanted!
Also, the holograph-effect is barely visible on the nail.
It's a nice polish. But not a great one. I like it, but I don't love it. It's also started to chip after about 18 hours on the nail. Boo! Holographic polishes are notoriously chippy though, so maybe that's me being picky. I bought mine from eBay.
Application was exceedingly sheer, meaning I still have visible nail lines, and ... it's pink. Not this orange shade you see here under my halogen lights, and not the crimson you assume from the name. It's pink. Fuschia-pink under most lights. Not a bad colour, as it happens, but not what I wanted!
Also, the holograph-effect is barely visible on the nail.
It's a nice polish. But not a great one. I like it, but I don't love it. It's also started to chip after about 18 hours on the nail. Boo! Holographic polishes are notoriously chippy though, so maybe that's me being picky. I bought mine from eBay.
Wednesday, 17 February 2010
Organic Wednesday - NEOM Candles
Candles. Oh, how I love candles! Jonathan Ward, Kenneth Turner and now NEOM, I love them all ... was especially delighted when I found out this week that NEOM are expanding their fragrance library to 12 this March with the addition of two new varieties of candle.
Serenity, which has hints of vanilla and sandalwood and about which NEOM say: "For the ultimate piece of me-time, comfort in warming tones of vanilla, a fantastically comforting scent, combined with woody and calming sandalwood. Also works as a gentle aphrodisiac." Hmn, now that sounds more interesting than I thought when I first read it ....
Also, (and this is the one I'm really excited about) they're bringing out a Sumptuous variety too, which combines rose and neroli - two of my all time favourite scents - and they have this to say about it: "The most deliciously decadent scent in the NEOM library, rose is calming, soothing oil whilst precious neroli (orange blossom) lifts your spirit and calms the mind. Quite simply - the most opulent feel-good scent in the world."
The candles are entirely organic and have a natural base. You can buy them from NEOM online, or Planet Organic. I'll be chatting to Nicola Elliot about the brand very soon, so you'll be able to find out more about them then, keep an eye out!
Organic Wednesday - Dr Bronner vs Method
Doing things slightly differently this week - haven't done a side by side comparison for a while, so I thought I'd do one now.
I've mentioned how much I like Dr Bronner soaps before and they have a new one available from their Shikakai range, and in this trial, I'm using the peppermint version - I'm a sucker for peppermint:
And in the clear corner, I'll be testing Method's handwash in Sweet Water:
Now, both of these products are organic, and claim to be non-drying, and contain no ingredients known to irritate skin.
Here's how they look out of the bottles (Dr Bronner first, then Method)
I've mentioned how much I like Dr Bronner soaps before and they have a new one available from their Shikakai range, and in this trial, I'm using the peppermint version - I'm a sucker for peppermint:
And in the clear corner, I'll be testing Method's handwash in Sweet Water:
Now, both of these products are organic, and claim to be non-drying, and contain no ingredients known to irritate skin.
Here's how they look out of the bottles (Dr Bronner first, then Method)
Dr Bronners is a thin, runny liquid that's very difficult to control ... it's also an odd colour, how unnattractive is that yellow-y brown? The Method is a more familiar gel-style affair (trust me, it is there in the photo, I assure you!) that won't run all down your arm while you're trying to take photos of it. Of course, that might just be my problem ...
Here's how they foam. I don't know about you, but I LOVE a proper foamy handwash, even though I know that many foaming agents are bad for your skin! As before, Dr Bronner first, then Method:
Just to be clear, I used one full pump of each product, and hands were washed consecutively, in the same temperature water. As you can see, the Dr Bronner has foamed up magnificently, very surprising as the main ingredients appear to be sugar and a seed extract! The Method doesn't foam up nearly so well, although compared to a lot of organic SLS-free cleansers, it's actually pretty good. Even compared to Method's own moisturising handwash, this is good foam. Dr Bronner's peppermint smells precisely like washing your hands with a stick of Blackpool rock (not as sticky though) where Method has a more generic, gentle, slightly perfumed scent, which is not at all unpleasant.
Neither soap left my hands dried out, which is great. Even though I do like a foaming hand wash I hate it when it leaves my hands feeling dry after, or worse, feeling like I need handcream. I don't believe in handcream (or toner, or body lotion. Yes, I'm a weird, I know), so don't use it too often, and hate feeling that another product I'm using is forcing me to use it.
I guess which one you'll prefer will come down to what you want from your handwash, Method's wash is undoubtedly the one that'll look more stylish in your bathroom, but Dr Bronner is the one that'll give you the most satisfaction when you use it! Both of these have pride of place in the bathrooms around our house, and I guess which one we buy next depends on which one runs out first!
Dr Bronner is available from Victoria Health, independent health food shops and Liberty in London, whereas you can buy Method from Boots, Waitrose or from the Method website.
Tuesday, 16 February 2010
Onix Blowdry - Two Months on ...
Most of my readers now that before Christmas I had a three month blowdry at Comptons, and I loved it. I gave a follow up post a little later but after a few requests, I thought it was time I gave an update on how it looks now. Going back to the picture I took of my hair on Saturday, this is how it looks now:
I have to say though that yes, my hair is not as straight as it was when I first had it done, and it's no longer wash and go to keep it completely straight. The above picture was taken after a swift five minute blow dry using my fingers instead of a brush or comb. Here's how it looks if I let it air-dry now:
As you can see, there's a little curling at the ends, but it still looks natural, and it's still a whole heap better than it was before the treatment. I still haven't used my straighteners, and I only use my hair-dryer for special occasions. Still not using any styling products either, which is wonderful and it STILL doesn't fuzz up in the rain.
I'd recommend this treatment - and Compton Hair- to anyone who's ever been fed up with wavy/curly or just plain fuzzy hair, it's been a life-changing experience for me! Having just that little bit of extra time every day is wonderful, I love it.
I have to say though that yes, my hair is not as straight as it was when I first had it done, and it's no longer wash and go to keep it completely straight. The above picture was taken after a swift five minute blow dry using my fingers instead of a brush or comb. Here's how it looks if I let it air-dry now:
As you can see, there's a little curling at the ends, but it still looks natural, and it's still a whole heap better than it was before the treatment. I still haven't used my straighteners, and I only use my hair-dryer for special occasions. Still not using any styling products either, which is wonderful and it STILL doesn't fuzz up in the rain.
I'd recommend this treatment - and Compton Hair- to anyone who's ever been fed up with wavy/curly or just plain fuzzy hair, it's been a life-changing experience for me! Having just that little bit of extra time every day is wonderful, I love it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
©
Get Lippie | All rights reserved.