Confession time: I recently spent some time having tea with Guerlain's utterly charming, handsome (and funny with it) Thierry Wasser, and, to my complete chagrin, after an extremely pleasant, and polite, question and answer session, I - for it was, of course, I - managed to drag the conversation down so far into the gutter that Thierry ended up miming how to get into a pair of Spanx for the delight and edification of our tea-partners. I'm not proud of myself*. If, however, Guerlain ever do produce a fragrance named "La Petite Spanx Noir", I want commission.
Which brings me politely (or not - your mileage may, as they say, vary) to this:
Perfume for your knickers. From Guerlain. Guerlain say:
"Close to the skin, in the very place where fragrance settles, our
lingerie lies... and this inspired Guerlain to conceive of an innovative
beauty ritual. A delicate new fragrance to spray onto lingerie,
creating a special moment of sensuality in which women are invited to
indulge..."
To which I say: " ...er ... does it come with a free tube of Canesten?" Now, admittedly my "special moments of sensuality" these days usually involve a jammy doughnut, a nice cup of tea, and a brief half an hour with the Hugh Jackman DVD+ of my choosing, but still ... a fragrance too far? I think I'd rather scent my drawers than my "drawers", personally. What say you?
It'll be available exclusively in Harrods from February. The perfect Valentine's gift ...
* This sentence may be a lie**
** IS a lie. It may be the single proudest moment I've ever had as a blogger. I am, however, now banned from the Connaught Hotel tea-rooms as a result.
+ Paperback Hero, seeing as you didn't ask.
Image shamelessly stolen from Basenotes.
This post: Guerlain Eau De Lingerie originated at: Get Lippie on 21st January 2013. All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Monday 21 January 2013
Sunday 20 January 2013
Wedding Prep with Braun Gillette Venus Naked Skin IPL 2
Well, I said I'd keep you posted with how I was getting on with the Gillette Venus Naked Skin IPL and here I am back to talk to you about my armpits. I know, I'm far too kind. No you don't have to thank me, you're welcome.
I've used it three times now - will just be able to squeeze two more treatments in before the wedding, which is now less than a month away - and I think I can say that my hair growth has indeed slowed down, I shave less often, and it's a bit finer when the hair does come through, but ... I still do have to shave my pits on a weekly basis. This isn't such a hardship really, but I'm hoping for more dramatic results with the next two treatments!
I was asked to provide a video of my using the system. For the sake of both my sanity, and your eyeballs, I've gleefully had to decline that particular delight, as, well, this is a family blog, and no one deserves that, frankly. So here's a little video of how it works, complete with a model. It's remarkably true to how I use it, even down to the wistful gazing into the middle distance whilst writhing about in my grundies on the carpet.
Enjoy! By the way, am I the only person on the planet who thought it was pronounced "brawn" rather than "brown"? Well, you learn something new every day, don't you?
The Fine Print: PR Sample. Video all my own work*.
*NOT MY OWN WORK.
This post: Wedding Prep with Braun Gillette Venus Naked Skin IPL 2 originated at: Get Lippie on January 20th 2013. All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Friday 18 January 2013
Clarins Rouge Eclat Age Defying Lipstick Nude Rose & Pink Berry
It's a tough gig having a blog named after lipstick you know ... all those lipsticks and only one face to apply them to. I mean, I've tried getting MrLippie to help out wearing all the stuff I don't have time for, but well, it's just not the same ...
Anyhoo, These turned up last week, and they're rather nice. A new formula from Clarins, designed to fight the signs of ageing on the lips, (something I'm not entirely convinced about, but that's by the by), but hey, let's forget about that, and look at the packaging!
Now that, my friends, is some fancy-ass lipstick packaging. I like it. Like it rather a lot, actually. As you're about to be able to tell:
This reminds me of Battersea Power Station for some strange reason. I need to get out more. |
There's lipstick in here, as well.
I prefer the more neutral colours from the collection, my picks are Nude Rose, and Pink Berry, both of which will work with a variety of skintones, and are very nice everyday shades.
The formula is nice, moisturising and cushiony, it reminds me, a little of Chantecaille Lip Chics, but, is it anti-ageing? Well, based on a couple of wears, I couldn't possibly answer that, but it doesn't dry your lips out, which is by far the most ageing thing you can do to your mush, frankly.
The Fine Print: PR Samples. Why was the sand wet? Because the sea weed!
This post: Clarins Rouge Eclat Age Defying Lipstick Nude Rose & Pink Berry originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Thursday 17 January 2013
Lipstick Queen Look of Love vs Jean Queen Comparison
Last Lipstick Queen post for a while, I promise! In my Look of Love review last week, I mentioned that if you owned Jean Queen you might not need Look of Love too, and a reader (waves at Pink Sith) asked if I could compare them. So here you go.
Artificial Light |
Daylight |
All rather neutral, all very wearable, and not quite as similar as I expected. Funny how the memory plays tricks ...
Fine Print: Mixture of purchases and PR samples. A magician was driving down the road, then he turned into a drive way. You're loving these jokes, aren't you? I'm not.
This post: Lipstick Queen Look of Love vs Jean Queen Comparison originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Wednesday 16 January 2013
Possible Wedding Manicure ...?
The wedding is now just over four weeks away. The makeup trial has been done, the dress has been adjusted, the reception decisions are almost all made, I remain a blogger in search of a hairdo, however, and owing to budget constraints I'm going to have to do my nails myself. Ah well, I've had fun over the last few weeks experimenting with nail colours to go with my dress. However, I've been thinking that purple fingernails with a purple dress is just a bit too matchy-matchy for me.
After all, I have a tendency to paint my nails whatever colour I like on a Sunday evening and then just wear the hell out of it till it, basically, falls off. As beauty bloggers go, I'm a lousy one when it comes to nails. This combination though, happened by accident (I didn't like one of the shades, so was covering it up) but I rather like silver with purple, so at the moment, this is the front-runner for wedding-nails. From left to right we have Out the Door topcoat in Northern Lights, which is a holographic fast-drying topcoat, OPI's Lucern-tenly Look Marvellous (which as most people call me Luce is apposite, at the least), and finally Deborah Lippman's Believe, which was created with Cher. If you can't channel Cher on your wedding day, frankly, then I don't want to know.
The final product (two coats of Believe, one very thin coat of Lucerne, and a topcoat of Northern Lights) looks like this:
It's about four days old on my nails there, so forgive the state of it in the pictures. It's silvery, and glittery without being too grey, and without screaming GLITTER. What do you think?
The Fine Print: Purchases. What do you call it when a dinosaur crashes his car? Tyrannosaurus Wrecks
This post: Possible Wedding Manicure ...? originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Tuesday 15 January 2013
Lipstick Queen Saint & Sinner Wine Comparison
I was so happy with Lipstick Queen Saint Wine recently, that I immediately went out and bought the same shade in the Sinner formulation:
I own a lot of lipsticks, and, well, let's face it, if I never bought another one ever again, I'd still have enough lipstick to last me the rest of my life, even if I sprouted another face. Or three, frankly. Does that stop me buying it though? Of course not. Especially when I love the shade. And I do love this:
A warm red, unusual for such a dark shade not to read as having orange or brown undertones, I like it because it is actually still a red on the lips. It's a dark, dramatic shade, but not one that someone is likely to mistake you for an elderly goth when you're wearing it. Which is nice. I thought a comparion to the Saint formulation might be handy too, though, so if you're not that confident about wearing dark lips, you can see how both variations of Wine work for you:
You can see from the bullets that Sinner (on the left) is a little redder, and Saint has a hint of brown, making the sheerer shade appear a little more purple in the bullet. This becomes even more apparent on swatching:
Saint will allow some of your natural lip colour through, however, making it appear less brown in wear, as you can see in the lipswatches below:
I find both formulations very comfortable in wear - whilst the Sinner formula is obviously less moisturising than Saint (it contains 90% pigment versus the 10% in Saint), it's not drying at all, and lasts very well, unless you're eating something greasy. It lacks a little of the slip of Saint, but it's a matte formulation I'm happy to wear and forget about.
The Lipstick Queen Saints & Sinners range now comprises 20 shades in each formulation, up from the ten that have been around for a long time now. Which are your favourites?
The Fine Print: Mixture of PR samples and purchases. I'm nice like that. Why couldn't Dracula's wife get to sleep? Because of the coffin.
This post: Lipstick Queen Saint & Sinner Wine Comparison originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Monday 14 January 2013
MAC Stereo Rose vs New CiD Coral Crush Comparison
I once read a tweet - or possibly a blog post - about a girl who had hysterics when she discovered that MAC had sold out of their Stereo Rose Mineralize Skinfinish almost at the exact instant it was first released a couple of years ago. I've been boggling about both the product, and the state of mind of that poor girl ever since.
On hearing that MAC had recently re-released this cult item, a blusher capable of making grown women weep, I naturally picked one up. I think the hype has died down a bit on this one now, as I bought this from the Covent Garden store well after the release hit the shops, and they still had them in-store. I have seen people tweeting about stocking up on it though, so ... who knows?
Well, it's a very nice blusher, a pink-coral, highly pigmented, and the gold veining is very nice indeed. It's a highly shimmery (not glittery) finish, so you won't need a highlighter with it as well. Can I figure out why it's a heartbreaker? Well, not really. It's lovely - genuinely - not hard and prone to glazing as a lot of MAC powders can be, it's soft and easy to blend, but if I didn't have it, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
I'll show you why:
I appear to already have it! On the right there is Coral Crush by New CiD, don't let the picture fool you, my camera is making it look pinker than it actually is, for some reason, but these two products are actually very similar in shade, so much so that if you're not a makeup obsessive like myself (and even I'm distancing myself from the crying girl I opened this post with, let's face it), then you won't need both.
MAC Stereo Rose is actually a little more pigmented than New CiD as you can tell in the unblended swatch above, which, if you don't own the right brush could be a little problem, you need a very light hand in application, whereas the lighter pigmentation in the New CiD enables it to be a bit more buildable, which, for a cack-handed muppet like myself, is a blessing.
On blending the differences are even less obvious. Both give a gorgeous glow to the skin, and, it has to be said that New CiD is one of my most used cosmetic products of all time because of this. So, do I need both? No! Am I glad to have both? Yes. Have either of them made me cry? No!
MAC Stereo Rose is a limited edition product, so stock up on tissues just in case you can't fnd it. If you're of a more sensible bent, New CiD Coral Crush is a permanent part of their lineup. No tissues required.
The Fine Print: Mixture of PR samples and purchases. Q: Why did the rubber chicken cross the road? A: She wanted to stretch her legs.
This post: MAC Stereo Rose vs New CiD Coral Crush Comparison originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
On hearing that MAC had recently re-released this cult item, a blusher capable of making grown women weep, I naturally picked one up. I think the hype has died down a bit on this one now, as I bought this from the Covent Garden store well after the release hit the shops, and they still had them in-store. I have seen people tweeting about stocking up on it though, so ... who knows?
Well, it's a very nice blusher, a pink-coral, highly pigmented, and the gold veining is very nice indeed. It's a highly shimmery (not glittery) finish, so you won't need a highlighter with it as well. Can I figure out why it's a heartbreaker? Well, not really. It's lovely - genuinely - not hard and prone to glazing as a lot of MAC powders can be, it's soft and easy to blend, but if I didn't have it, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
I'll show you why:
I appear to already have it! On the right there is Coral Crush by New CiD, don't let the picture fool you, my camera is making it look pinker than it actually is, for some reason, but these two products are actually very similar in shade, so much so that if you're not a makeup obsessive like myself (and even I'm distancing myself from the crying girl I opened this post with, let's face it), then you won't need both.
MAC Stereo Rose is actually a little more pigmented than New CiD as you can tell in the unblended swatch above, which, if you don't own the right brush could be a little problem, you need a very light hand in application, whereas the lighter pigmentation in the New CiD enables it to be a bit more buildable, which, for a cack-handed muppet like myself, is a blessing.
On blending the differences are even less obvious. Both give a gorgeous glow to the skin, and, it has to be said that New CiD is one of my most used cosmetic products of all time because of this. So, do I need both? No! Am I glad to have both? Yes. Have either of them made me cry? No!
MAC Stereo Rose is a limited edition product, so stock up on tissues just in case you can't fnd it. If you're of a more sensible bent, New CiD Coral Crush is a permanent part of their lineup. No tissues required.
The Fine Print: Mixture of PR samples and purchases. Q: Why did the rubber chicken cross the road? A: She wanted to stretch her legs.
This post: MAC Stereo Rose vs New CiD Coral Crush Comparison originated at: Get Lippie All rights reserved. If you are not reading this post at Get Lippie, then this content has been stolen by a scraper
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
©
Get Lippie | All rights reserved.